Re: Services that shouldn't be started in the first place: Was F29... hide.. grub

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/20/2018 05:53 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
I believe we're missing something fundamental here.  If a program/service etc. requires specific hardware to work and it can't gracefully handle situations where that hardware is not present - it shouldn't be a default.

The way to handle this (and other similar situations) is to take away the default status until it can handle situations where the hardware doesn't exist.  This is systems programming 101 - and frankly I am a
bit surprised it's a matter of debate.

There is a similar situation with other services, in particular the VM support services. They are turned on by default, they would fail if not running on the specific VM, but they are set to be conditional on being run in that VM. I don't see how that is different than this case.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/PPZ6HHOXFCAQ4LZMVF6XRH2LIBLADZIF/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux