Re: i686 kernel missing on rawhide / disabling archs in critical path pkgs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Having said all this, the message about brokenness on x86 SIG mailing
> list doesn't appear to be treated with the urgency I think it needs,
> givin the ripple effect it has from a critical path package. There were
> a few messages the day after it was reported, and then nothing until
> Wednesday.

It is pretty clear that the x86 mailing list is just a fake put up to keep 
the architecture running. Just look at the ridiculously low activity at:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

This month's activity is unusually high because the "F29 System Wide Change: 
i686 Is For x86-64" thread (i.e., the discussion on enabling SSE2) was 
mostly cross-posted from this list (devel) to that list (x86). But otherwise 
this is little more than a Potemkin village. There is very little going on 
behind the façade.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/PE54WTVCMS7HF4U52RL3PTWTXXAZ6DOH/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux