>>>>> "CM" == Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: CM> The installer right now, against upstream mdadm dev's explicit CM> advice, sets up an mdadm raid1 using (I think deprecated 0.9 CM> metadata format but could also work with 1.0 format). And I'm really happy that it does; I have used that configuration for years on a number of machines and have had good luck. I had previously run multiple ESPs with something to sync between them and it also worked, but was actually more fragile in practice. So to me it's a toss up between two bad choices, foisted on us by the shortsightedness of whichever committee of committees "designed" UEFI. Their solution was obviously to either tell everyone to use a "real" RAID controller or use "BIOS RAID" (and these days, maybe pay Intel for a physical license key/VROC dongle). - J< _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/DTCLEKQETTUTV2D6PYWWG2JYHQM4EFDK/
