IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages
  • From: Jorge Contreras
• Confidentiality notices on email messages
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt> (Web Host
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt> (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: Last Call: <draft-yevstifeyev-ion-report-06.txt> (Report on the Experiment with IETF Operational Notes (IONs)) to Informational RFC
  • From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
• Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard: request for max frame size
  • From: Francis Brosnan Blazquez
• Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Nomcom 2011-2012: Final List of Volunteers
  • From: NomCom Chair
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Greg Wilkins
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
• Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
• Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
• Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
• Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Repetitions and consensus
  • From: Turchanyi Geza
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
• Repetitions and consensus
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: neil.2.harrison
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David Allan I
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: neil.2.harrison
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David Allan I
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: neil.2.harrison
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David Allan I
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Julian Reschke
• MILE side meeting, IETF81 in Quebec, Monday night July 25th
  • From: Brian Trammell
• secdir review of draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis
  • From: Richard L. Barnes
• Bar BOF for IRTF work on energy efficiency
  • From: Juergen Quittek
• Re: Spurious MTU in IPv6 RAs Where WAN is PPPoE
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• [no subject]
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Spurious MTU in IPv6 RAs Where WAN is PPPoE
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Spurious MTU in IPv6 RAs Where WAN is PPPoE
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: notes from discussion of KARP design guidelines
  • From: Joel Halpern
• Re: Spurious MTU in IPv6 RAs Where WAN is PPPoE
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: reading drafts on an ipad
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Spurious MTU in IPv6 RAs Where WAN is PPPoE
  • From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Re: Dropping 2002::/16 considered very harmful
  • From: Cameron Byrne
• Dropping 2002::/16 considered very harmful
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: reading drafts on an ipad
  • From: Behcet Sarikaya
• RE: [mpls] LastCall: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indicationfor MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John E Drake
• Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Thomas Nadeau
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: neil.2.harrison
• Re: [v6ops] 6to4 to Experimental? (was: Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic)
  • From: Mohacsi Janos
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: neil.2.harrison
• Nomcom 2011-2012: Timeline and Selection Seeds
  • From: NomCom Chair
• Re: reading drafts on an ipad
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: [BEHAVE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-behave-ftp64-12.txt
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: R: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-identifiers-06.txt> (MPLS-TP Identifiers) to Proposed Standard
  • From: George Swallow
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John E Drake
• Re: [v6ops] 6to4 to Experimental? (was: Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic)
  • From: Turchanyi Geza
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: reading drafts on an ipad
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: 6to4 to Experimental? (was: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic)
  • From: Ole Troan
• Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Ole Troan
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Rui Costa
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: Joe Touch
• RE: [mpls] R: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David Allan I
• RE: [mpls] R: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David Allan I
• R: Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: erminio.ottone_69@xxxxxxxxx
• R: Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: erminio.ottone_69@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: extra room avail IETF hotel at IETF rate
  • From: Olafur Gudmundsson
• RE: [mpls] R: Re: LastCall: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indicationfor MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
• RE: [mpls] R: Re: LastCall: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indicationfor MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
• RE: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: reading drafts on an ipad
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: reading drafts on an ipad
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: [PCN] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pcn-cl-edge-behaviour-08.txt> (PCN Boundary Node Behaviour for the Controlled Load (CL) Mode of Operation) to Informational RFC
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: reading drafts on an ipad
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: james woodyatt
• Re: reading drafts on an ipad
  • From: Klaas Wierenga
• Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: reading drafts on an ipad
  • From: Dave Cridland
• reading drafts on an ipad
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David Allan I
• R: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-identifiers-06.txt> (MPLS-TP Identifiers) to Proposed Standard
  • From: D'Alessandro Alessandro Gerardo
• RE: GEN-ART review for draft-li-pwe3-ms-pw-pon-03
  • From: Lihongyu(Hongyu)
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Randy Bush
• Recall: GEN-ART review for draft-li-pwe3-ms-pw-pon-03
  • From: Lihongyu(Hongyu)
• RE: GEN-ART review for draft-li-pwe3-ms-pw-pon-03
  • From: Lihongyu(Hongyu)
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David Allan I
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Mark Smith
• Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-pwe3-fat-pw-06
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-05
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-advisory dependency on draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-advisory dependency on draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: C. M. Heard
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [MBONED] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mboned-ssmping-08.txt> (Multicast Ping Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stig Venaas
• extra room avail IETF hotel at IETF rate
  • From: Geoff Mulligan
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mboned-ssmping-08.txt> (Multicast Ping Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Tim Chown
• RE: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: DNSBLSs and caches, was Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Ronald Bonica
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Mark Smith
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Mark Smith
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Mark Smith
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Mark Smith
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Mark Smith
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Mark Smith
• Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt> (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback
  • From: Eve Maler
• tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mptcp-congestion-05
  • From: david.black
• Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt> (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback
  • From: Justin Richer
• Nomcom 2011-2012: Third Call for Volunteers
  • From: NomCom Chair
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Arturo Servin
• Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt> (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback
  • From: William J. Mills
• Re: Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt> (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback
  • From: Eran Hammer-Lahav
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Arturo Servin
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Philip Homburg
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Gert Doering
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Ray Hunter
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Ray Hunter
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Randy Bush
• RE: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Frank Bulk
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Erik Kline
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Erik Kline
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Philip Homburg
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: Mark Andrews
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Rui Costa
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: Martin Sustrik
• 6to4 to Experimental? (was: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Mark Andrews
• RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Ronald Bonica
• RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Ronald Bonica
• Re:draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: TJ
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Cameron Byrne
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Cameron Byrne
• Re: Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt> (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: SM
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Cameron Byrne
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• RE: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Ronald Bonica
• RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Doug Barton
• RE: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Ronald Bonica
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: Comments surrounding draft-iab-dns-applications-01
  • From: Danny McPherson
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Cameron Byrne
• Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 38, Issue 6
  • From: osa . peter
• draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
  • From: Ronald Bonica
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Kenneth Voort
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Cameron Byrne
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: [mpls] Review: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-identifiers-06- Tunnel Identifier
  • From: George Swallow
• Re: SORBS blacklist
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: SORBS blacklist
  • From: John Levine
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: SORBS blacklist
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: SORBS blacklist
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: SORBS blacklist
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: SORBS blacklist
  • From: Kurt Zeilenga
• Re: SORBS blacklist
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: SORBS blacklist
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: SORBS blacklist
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: SORBS blacklist
  • From: David Morris
• Re: SORBS blacklist
  • From: Glen
• Re: SORBS blacklist
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-05.txt> (IPv6 Flow Label Specification) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-05.txt> (IPv6 Flow Label Specification) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Alexandru Petrescu
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Mark Townsley
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Mark Townsley
• Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Ralph Droms (rdroms)
• Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Stephen [kiwin] PALM
• Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Ralph Droms (rdroms)
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Keith Moore
• Review: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-identifiers-06- Tunnel Identifier
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• SORBS blacklist
  • From: John Leslie
• reminder: Itojun Service Award 2011 nomination
  • From: Jun Murai
• Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: james woodyatt
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: james woodyatt
• TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-karp-design-guide
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Mark Townsley
• Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Stephen [kiwin] PALM
• Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Weil, Jason
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Stephen [kiwin] PALM
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Stephen [kiwin] PALM
• RE: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: erik.taraldsen
• Re: [BEHAVE] FW: Last Call: <draft-ietf-behave-ftp64-10.txt> (An FTP ALG for IPv6-to-IPv4 translation) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• RE: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Mark Townsley
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Dan White
• MILE 'side meeting' Monday night July 25th
  • From: kathleen.moriarty
• tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-pim-mtid-08
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: [sidr] TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-karp-design-guide
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [sidr] TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-karp-design-guide
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: [sidr] TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-karp-design-guide
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [sidr] TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-karp-design-guide
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 37, Issue 103
  • From: otuenehoj
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-karp-design-guide
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Cameron Byrne
• Re: HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 37, Issue 103
  • From: Amenawon Osa Peter
• RE: [ftpext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts-02.txt> (File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual Hosts) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert McMurray
• HOMENET working group proposal
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [ftpext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts-02.txt> (File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual Hosts) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Paul Ford-Hutchinson
• Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-p2mp-14
  • From: IJsbrand Wijnands
• RE: [ftpext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts-02.txt> (File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual Hosts) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert McMurray
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard
  • From: Rolf E. Sonneveld
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Anyone need a room at the Hilton?
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22
  • From: Scott Rose
• GEN-ART review for draft-li-pwe3-ms-pw-pon-03
  • From: kathleen.moriarty
• RE: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22
  • From: Ben Campbell
• RE: [ftpext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts-02.txt> (File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual Hosts) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert McMurray
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-roll-of0-14
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support
  • From: Ole Troan
• Operations Directorate Review of draft-ietf-soc-overload-design
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-05 (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-05 (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC
  • From: SM
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-02.txt> (Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF) to BCP
  • From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
• RE: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22.txt> (Update to DNAME Redirection in the DNS) to Proposed Standard
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-02.txt> (Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF) to BCP
  • From: SM
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: SM
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard
  • From: SM
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: SM
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [ftpext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts-02.txt> (File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual Hosts) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
• RE: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: james woodyatt
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: james woodyatt
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Cameron Byrne
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: RFC production center XML format usage, was: [IAOC] xml2rfc and legal services RFPs
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Martin Rex
• Nomcom 2011-2012: Second Call for Volunteers
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard
  • From: Al Iverson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [ftpext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts-02.txt> (File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual Hosts) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
• RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: RJ Atkinson
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: RJ Atkinson
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22
  • From: Scott Rose
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts-02
  • From: Roni Even
• Agenda for IETF 81 not available
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Yang C Sijes
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: t.petch
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
• [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-p2mp-14
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard
  • From: John Levine
• TSVDIR review request - draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-multihoming-without-ipv6nat
  • From: David Harrington
• Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Lachlan Hunt
• Re: External IPR Disclosures vs IPR disclosures in the document.
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard
  • From: Doug Otis
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt> (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: External IPR Disclosures vs IPR disclosures in the document.
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: External IPR Disclosures vs IPR disclosures in the document.
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide
  • From: Krishna Birth
• Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide
  • From: Krishna Birth
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Google to Host IETF Meeting
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• RE: Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt> (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback
  • From: Paul E. Jones
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04
  • From: Ole Troan
• Re: External IPR Disclosures vs IPR disclosures in the document.
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: whine, whine, whine
  • From: John Levine
• Re: External IPR Disclosures vs IPR disclosures in the document.
  • From: John C Klensin
• External IPR Disclosures vs IPR disclosures in the document.
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide
  • From: Ted Ts'o
• tools.ietf.org problem with RFC-to-be6282 (AUTH48)
  • From: Mathieu Goessens
• Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: whine, whine, whine
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide
  • From: Ray Bellis
• Re: whine, whine, whine
  • From: Ray Bellis
• My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide
  • From: Krishna Birth
• Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt> (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
• Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: 25 or 6to4
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: 25 or 6to4
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: 25 or 6to4
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Re: 25 or 6to4
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: 25 or 6to4
  • From: Ralph Droms
• 25 or 6to4
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: whine, whine, whine
  • From: Jari Arkko
• RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
• RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• RE: whine, whine, whine
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: whine, whine, whine
  • From: RJ Atkinson
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: t.petch
• Re: whine, whine, whine
  • From: Klaas Wierenga
• RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: location preferences
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: whine, whine, whine
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: whine, whine, whine
  • From: Ray Bellis
• Re: whine, whine, whine
  • From: John Levine
• Re: whine, whine, whine
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: whine, whine, whine
  • From: CAUCHIE Grégory
• Re: whine, whine, whine
  • From: Ray Bellis
• RE: whine, whine, whine
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: whine, whine, whine
  • From: Simon Perreault
• Re: whine, whine, whine
  • From: Simon Perreault
• RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Lou Berger
• Re: location preferences
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Thomas Heide Clausen
• Re: whine, whine, whine
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: John Levine
• Re: whine, whine, whine
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Mark Andrews
• getting there
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Henk Uijterwaal
• Thanks! (was: Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?)
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Glen Zorn
• whine, whine, whine
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Henk Uijterwaal
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: location preferences
  • From: James M. Polk
• Re: Getting to Quebec City
  • From: Julien Laganier
• Re: location preferences
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• Re: Getting to Quebec City
  • From: Randall Gellens
• RE: location preferences
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: location preferences
  • From: Dave CROCKER
• location preferences (was: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?)
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Mary Barnes
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: John C Klensin
• IETF-meta (Was: Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?)
  • From: Richard L. Barnes
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Simon Perreault
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Thomas Nadeau
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04.txt> (Codec Requirements) to Informational RFC
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: John E Drake
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Henk Uijterwaal
• Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-08
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Gen-ART LC Review of draft-law-rfc4869bis-01
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04.txt> (Codec Requirements) to Informational RFC
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Getting to Quebec City
  • From: Simon Perreault
• Re: Getting to Quebec City
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: Getting to Quebec City
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: Getting to Quebec City
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: Getting to Quebec City
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Getting to Quebec City
  • From: Alastair Johnson
• Re: Getting to Quebec City
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Getting to Quebec City
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Getting to Quebec City
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: Getting to Quebec City
  • From: Mary Barnes
• Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: John Levine
• Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Getting to Quebec City
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: Getting to Quebec City
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: Getting to Quebec City
  • From: Hamza GHARSALLAH
• Re: Getting to Quebec City
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Getting to Quebec City
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Getting to Quebec City
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Getting to Quebec City
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04.txt> (Codec Requirements) to Informational RFC
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Boris Zbarsky
• RE: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04.txt> (Codec Requirements) to Informational RFC
  • From: Christian Hoene
• Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• RE: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
• Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-02.txt> (Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF) to BCP
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-02.txt> (Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF) to BCP
  • From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC
  • From: Mark Smith
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC
  • From: Gert Doering
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC
  • From: Mark Smith
• Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti