Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic

[Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 3, 2011, at 1:58 AM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:

On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Mark Smith <ipng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I don't object to what has been proposed, yet I object to
"6to4-historic" because I'm an extremely happy anycast 6to4 user

"It works for me, so there's obviously no problem". When you think of 6to4-historic, please think of the 20% of anycast 6to4 users that are broken.

6to4 used to be far less reliable than that, but has improved as additional relays were deployed.   It's reasonable to expect that the publication of -advisory will improve the situation further.

Keith

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf