Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Mark Smith <ipng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't object to what has been proposed, yet I object to
"6to4-historic" because I'm an extremely happy anycast 6to4 user

"It works for me, so there's obviously no problem". When you think of 6to4-historic, please think of the 20% of anycast 6to4 users that are broken.

We know it can operate correctly and reliably if it is configured correctly.

But we also know that it's not configured correctly, to such an extent that it does not work at all in 20% of cases (Geoff's data). And we know of no reason why that would improve, though we do know of reasons why it would get worse (e.g., due to ISPs giving bogon public space to their users).
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]