Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic

[Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 2, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:

I saw the same thing. It is a shame that work that directly removes barriers to REAL ipv6 deployment gets shouted down by a few people not involved in REAL ipv6 deployment

I find myself wondering what you mean by REAL IPv6.  For me, REAL IPv6 is code that uses the IPv6 programming model, 128 bit addresses, end-to-end transparency, no NATs.  6to4 certainly qualifies.

Keith

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf