On Jun 30, 2011, at 1:09 AM, Martin Rex wrote: (a bunch of stuff in defense of NAT) Rather than having another of an endless series of discussions about the merits of NAT or lack thereof, can we just agree that it should not be pre-ordained that this WG should assume NAT as a solution? Keith _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf