Re: [v6ops] 6to4 to Experimental? (was: Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+1

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@xxxxxxx> wrote:



On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Ole Troan wrote:

Keith,

The alternative that I proposed to IESG and to the chairs (and never received any feedback about) was to reclassify 6to4 as Experimental.   Experimental seems completely appropriate for a protocol that is useful, but only in corner cases.  And I think it's also appropriate and useful to try to learn from the experience with 6to4, even if we realize that 6to4 will never be a generally applicable IPv6 transition solution again.

And maybe, just maybe, Experimental will be enough of a "slap" at 6to4 to mollify the "kill it yesterday" crowd.  For one thing, it clearly indicates that 6to4 is no longer a standard.

But in order to quieten down the discussion here, I suggest that people reply to me privately if they can't live with this.   If I get lots of those replies, I'll know that it's not worth pursuing.

"Experimental" is certainly better than:
- nothing
- spending months on hold as appeals are processed.

I proposed experimental also when discussion started about future of 6to4. I support the idea.
       Best Regards,
               Janos Mohacsi


_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]