> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Douglas Otis > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 6:51 PM > To: ietf@xxxxxxxx; Barry Leiba; iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx; Sean Turner > Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard > > [...] > > This indicates the DKIM specification is seriously flawed. While DKIM > may not offer author validation, it was intended to establish an > accountable domain for the signed message content that at a minimum > includes the From header field. There are NO valid reasons for a valid > signature to include multiple From header fields! Allowing multiple > From header fields is _EVIL_ and destroys DKIM's intended purpose as > defined by prior work. This purported security flaw and surrounding FUD was discussed at huge length in the working group, and consensus was clearly against the idea of dealing with this in DKIM because it's the wrong place to address the problem. The record, both in the issues tracker and in the working group's archive, is quite clear about this, and both are open to public scrutiny. And I find the tactic of taking a lost battle from a working group to the IETF as a whole to be akin to the "Mom said no, I'll go ask Dad!" strategy that I outgrew by the time I was a teenager... _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf