Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jul 5, 2011, at 6:39 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> 
> what people are saying is kill it because it is broken, bad, and does a dis-service to ipv6.

Actually, I seem to have been the only person who proposed killing it-- the rest of you seem to have settled on merely looking at it crossly and hoping it will wither away in shame.

By that I mean, I wrote up and circulated an Internet Draft to specify a phase-out plan for RFC 3056 and RFC 3068.  I chose not to submit it when it was made clear to me that no such plan could be adopted as a working group item.

On a related note, I much prefer Keith Moore's proposal to reclassify RFC 3056 and RFC 3068 as Experimental.


--
james woodyatt <jhw@xxxxxxxxx>
member of technical staff, core os networking



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]