Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 11:11:43PM -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
> There's clearly a lack of consensus to support it.

There's two very vocal persons opposing it and a much larger number of
people that support it, but have not the time to write a similarily
large amount of e-mails.  For me, this is enough for "rough consensus".

(And I second everything Lorenzo, Randy and Cameron said - there's 
theoretical possibilities, and real world.  6to4 fails the real-world
test.  Get over it, instead of attacking people that run real-world
networks for the decisions they need to do to keep the networks running
in a world without enough IPv4 addresses).

Gert Doering
        -- Operator
-- 
did you enable IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]