Gert Doering wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 11:11:43PM -0400, Keith Moore wrote: > > There's clearly a lack of consensus to support it. > > There's two very vocal persons opposing it There were more than two clearly opposing, and there is no need to further fuel the heated discussion by everyone becoming as vocal as Keith. The pain point is really the unnecessarily aggressive "kill what we don't like" move-to-historic action. This is a procedural issue, not a matter of personal taste. There was an alternative reclassification suggested, that could gather rough consensus. I'm still waiting for a *clean* resolution of the procedural issue (that means serious consideration of suggested alternatives). -Martin _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf