On 6/25/11 8:16 AM, John Leslie wrote:
I quite agree that -6to4-to-historic doesn't satisfy such a statement;
and I don't believe the IESG process for Informational track documents
gives any assurance of "consensus of the IETF community".
I believe the IESG concluded that, although the document itself is
Informational, it is moving two RFCs to Historic status, which is a
Standards Action, and that we would use whatever procedures are
appropriate to a Standards Action to act on the document. This was the
third point of my DISCUSS comment and I believe the rest of the IESG
agreed with me on this point.
pr
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf