Mark Andrews <marka@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > DNS[WB]L's have never been a good fit to the DNS, rather they have > not been a bad enough fit to require something better to be done. Oh come off it, they are just as good a fit to the DNS as reverse DNS is. > The naive approach of reversing the address, converting to nibbles > and appending a suffix won't scale. I don't understand why the setup is OK for reverse DNS but not blacklists. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot@xxxxxxxx> http://dotat.at/ Hebrides, Bailey, Fair Isle, Faeroes: Southeast 5 to 7, backing east or northeast 4 or 5, occasionally 6 in north Bailey. Moderate or rough. Occasional rain. Moderate or good, occasionally poor. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf