Rui: Ignored is a strong word....and does not bear scrutiny if you comapre the current document with the comments recevied. Attached is a spreadsheet of comment disposition for comments received during LC which included MPLS WG, BFD WG and those comments received from Q10. Dave -----Original Message----- From: mpls-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:mpls-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rui Costa Sent: Monday, July 04, 2011 3:03 PM To: ietf@xxxxxxxx; IETF-Announce Cc: mpls@xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard IMHO and for the record: ITU-T comments regarding this draft haven't been discussed with ITU-T but were simply ignored. No LS describing these comments' resolution was sent. Several service providers regarded this draft as not meeting their transport networks' needs. [The v03 draft was published in Feb and went to WG LC. The v04 draft addressing WG LC comments was published on the 28th June (same date as the proto write-up). When was the WG LC launched, to verify LC comments resolution?] Regards, Rui -----Original Message----- From: mpls-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:mpls-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of The IESG Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Junho de 2011 14:47 To: IETF-Announce Cc: mpls@xxxxxxxx Subject: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG (mpls) to consider the following document: - 'Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile' <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> as a Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2011-07-14. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract Continuity Check, Proactive Connectivity Verification and Remote Defect Indication functionalities are required for MPLS-TP OAM. Continuity Check monitors the integrity of the continuity of the label switched path for any loss of continuity defect. Connectivity verification monitors the integrity of the routing of the label switched path between sink and source for any connectivity issues. Remote defect indication enables an End Point to report, to its associated End Point, a fault or defect condition that it detects on a pseudo wire, label switched path or Section. This document specifies methods for proactive continuity check, continuity verification, and remote defect indication for MPLS-TP label switched paths, pseudo wires and Sections using Bidirectional Forwarding Detection. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
Attachment:
Last Call Comments with resolutionv6.xls
Description: Last Call Comments with resolutionv6.xls
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf