On 2011-02-23 11:09, Julian Reschke wrote:
...
I just realized that I have an archive of XML versions of RFCs in AUTH48
state; so I *can* report the percentage of XML versions since ~RFC5000.
Note that these may be inaccurate (for instance, not all RFC numbers get
assigned, right?); it just observes how much XML files ended up in AUTH48.
Here are the numbers:
RFC5000 - RFC5099: 41
RFC5100 - RFC5199: 44
RFC5200 - RFC5299: 47
RFC5300 - RFC5399: 48
RFC5400 - RFC5499: 64
RFC5500 - RFC5599: 59
RFC5600 - RFC5699: 58
RFC5700 - RFC5799: 64
RFC5800 - RFC5899: 63
RFC5900 - RFC5999: 68
RFC6000 - RFC6099: 69
...
Updated stats, just in time before the next meeting:
RFC5000 - RFC5099: 41
RFC5100 - RFC5199: 44
RFC5200 - RFC5299: 47
RFC5300 - RFC5399: 48
RFC5400 - RFC5499: 64
RFC5500 - RFC5599: 59
RFC5600 - RFC5699: 58
RFC5700 - RFC5799: 64
RFC5800 - RFC5899: 63
RFC5900 - RFC5999: 68
RFC6000 - RFC6099: 70
RFC6100 - RFC6199: 56
RFC6200 - RFC6299: 77
...so a drop in 6100..6199 (I wonder why?) and a all-time high in
6200..6299.
Best regards,
Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf