Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



    > From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>

    > I suspect that operators are *severely* under-represented on this
    > list (ietf@xxxxxxxx) because it is very noisy and operators have
    > other priorities.

Ah, operators. This would be the same group of people of whom, if the
recent anecdotal reports are much to go on, many (most?) are not bothering
to deploy IPv6 at all?

(Something which would seem to be very common among smaller operators,
whom one assumes, in typical long-tail fashion, form the majority of the
group.)

But their views are paramount?

I see.

	Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]