On Jun 24, 2011, at 8:10 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > On Jun 24, 2011, at 4:40 PM, Keith Moore wrote: > >> On Jun 24, 2011, at 7:10 PM, james woodyatt wrote: >> >>> I see that some of those in the opposition to 6to4-to-historic do not agree with me that the draft is utterly harmless and will be roundly ignored by industry. > > Were it completely harmless I think it wouldn't meet the needs of the authors or supporters either. Clearly they would prefer that it be off as a result, or that the usage be limited to people who've deliberately turned it on and therefore can be expected to tolerate the limitations. But there is general agreement to turn 6to4 off by default. It's the labeling of 6to4 as historic that is the divisive point. Keith _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf