Hello, In this draft, the editors of draft are not named as editors but as authors. Thus, I would suggest to follow the example given in http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5620.txt and add an ", Ed." behind the names. A list of authors is given in the acknowledgement section of the draft. With best regards, Christian Hoene > -----Original Message----- > From: codec-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:codec-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf > Of The IESG > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 9:24 PM > To: IETF-Announce > Cc: codec@xxxxxxxx > Subject: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04.txt> (Codec > Requirements) to Informational RFC > > > The IESG has received a request from the Internet Wideband Audio Codec > WG > (codec) to consider the following document: > - 'Codec Requirements' > <draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04.txt> as an Informational RFC > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2011-06-30. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > This document provides specific requirements for an Internet audio > codec. These requirements address quality, sampling rate, bit-rate, > and packet loss robustness, as well as other desirable properties. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-codec-requirements/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-codec-requirements/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > _______________________________________________ > codec mailing list > codec@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf