On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Dave Cridland <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You were banned there because your posts were (very) off-topic, you're not > local to South Wales, and finally because we felt like it - you have no > particular right to post to SWLUG's mailing list, after all. > > HTH, > > Dave. Your banning with a due process is baseless, there is not any by-laws or rules quotation from the Swlug main document/s which should be fixed with an unchangeable date stamp and any amendments to the main document/s should also have an unchangeable date stamp, for example on a Usenet public group. You and other that have banned, intimidated me need some education on how to run mailing lists. There are no grounds for you to ban me. Alug (Anglian) is another linux user group today in Britain who have joined the weasel worded racists chants by more or less banning me. The mid to late banners have questioned my linux projects as to why I wish to do them? When I have answered them that this is for spiritual reasons -- they then ban me by conjuring some lies, the rabbit in the hat trick. This is cheating and it does not give linux operating systems a good name. All the banners should unban me. This is racial law matter. Justice needs to be delivered. These professional salaried / fee-earning banners are not honest. They are cunning in their ways. I have a huge evidence against these modern day 'journeymen' at linux user groups in Britain and also in other areas. While I write this for the IETF under this subject, I also wish to complain about IETF being separate from the humanities, for example the new domain suffix proposed by The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) .xxx should not be put into use as it demeans females through pornography. Senior IETF members must voice their concerns. Regards Meeku _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf