james woodyatt wrote: > No, the WG supporters of this draft are firmly convinced that > 6to4-to-historic is also necessary because they mistakenly > believe it does something else that 6to4-advisory does not say. That IETF declare 6to4 historic means that IETF, naturally, won't produce any new document on 6to4. Masataka Ohta _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf