Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jun 24, 2011, at 3:57 PM, Doug Barton wrote:

By "your document" above are you referring to Brian's http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-advisory ? If so I would argue that the extensive WG discussion about both documents meets your criteria. Taken together the 2 documents represent a series of compromises between those of us whose opinion is "Kill 6to4 dead, yesterday" and those who would like to give it as graceful an exit as possible. 

Taken together, the message is confusing. 

And for those of you whose opinion is "KIll 6to4 dead, yesterday" - that's way beyond the scope of what v6ops was chartered to do.

Keith

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]