RE: [ftpext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts-02.txt> (File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual Hosts) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Mykyta,

Ah, now I see your point - that's a great catch, and I will add a section to a new version of the draft that I am working on for other IETF comments.

Thanks again!

-----Original Message-----
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev [mailto:evnikita2@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 9:33 PM
To: Robert McMurray
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx; ftpext@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ftpext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts-02.txt> (File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual Hosts) to Proposed Standard

OK, and if HOST is sent for the second time when the user hasn't got 
authenticated, eg.

S> 220 Server ready
C> HOST example.com
S> 220 HOST OK
C> HOST example.org
S> ???

I suppose it may be 503 reply or switching to the identified host with 
220 reply.  This situation isn't mentioned in your document.

Mykyta Yevstifeyev


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]