Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



All,

Since someone has commented about the process used for resolving questions on
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi I am supplying some details below.

The history of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi working group review
process is:

On February 3rd 2011 the working group last call was issued
on version -03

     This was copied to the the Ad Hoc Team List
     and liaised to SG15 also on February 3rd

     This working group last call ended om Feb 28


     On Feb 28 we also received a liaison with comments from SG15


The authors compiled a list of all comments received  as part the MPLS
working group last call; these  comments - and the intended resolution -
is included in the meeting minutes from the Prague meeting:


     http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/80/slides/mpls-9.pdf


 During the IETF meeting in Prague, we agreed with the BFD working
 group to do a separate working group last callfor the BFD working
 group

The (BFD) working group last call was started on March 30th and ran
for 13 days. The last call ended on April 11th.

 The authors have since worked hard to resolve comments, some
 issue has been brought to the working group mailing list for
 resolution.

 Version -04 of the document was published June 28th.

 The publication request for draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi was  sent
 June 29th.

 The AD review resulted in a "New ID needed" due to mostly editorial
 comments. Version -05 was published on June 29 and the IETF last call
 started as soon as the new ID was avaialbe.

 The current list of Last Call Comments resoltion is also avaiable at:
 http://www.pi.nu/~loa/cc-cv-rdi-Last-Call-Comments.xls

The list of issues that the authors kept very carefully, shows without doubt
 that no comments been ignored.

 Loa
 mpls wg document shepherd

On 2011-07-05 00:02, Rui Costa wrote:
IMHO and for the record:	

ITU-T comments regarding this draft haven't been discussed with ITU-T but were simply ignored. No LS describing these comments' resolution was sent.	

Several service providers regarded this draft as not meeting their transport networks' needs.	

[The v03 draft was published in Feb and went to WG LC.	
The v04 draft addressing WG LC comments was published on the 28th June (same date as the proto write-up).	
When was the WG LC launched, to verify LC comments resolution?]	

Regards,	
Rui


-----Original Message-----
From: mpls-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:mpls-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of The IESG
Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Junho de 2011 14:47
To: IETF-Announce
Cc: mpls@xxxxxxxx
Subject: [mpls] Last Call:<draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt>  (Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard


The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG
(mpls) to consider the following document:
- 'Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote
    Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile'
   <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt>  as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2011-07-14. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract

    Continuity Check, Proactive Connectivity Verification and Remote
    Defect Indication functionalities are required for MPLS-TP OAM.

    Continuity Check monitors the integrity of the continuity of the
    label switched path for any loss of continuity defect. Connectivity
    verification monitors the integrity of the routing of the label
    switched path between sink and source for any connectivity issues.
    Remote defect indication enables an End Point to report, to its
    associated End Point, a fault or defect condition that it detects on
    a pseudo wire, label switched path or Section.

    This document specifies methods for proactive continuity check,
    continuity verification, and remote defect indication for MPLS-TP
    label switched paths, pseudo wires and Sections using Bidirectional
    Forwarding Detection.


The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls


_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

--


Loa Andersson                         email: loa.andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            loa@xxxxx
Ericsson Inc                          phone: +46 10 717 52 13
                                             +46 767 72 92 13
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]