Comments inline........ -----Original Message----- From: Noel Chiappa [mailto:jnc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 5:29 PM To: ietf@xxxxxxxx; v6ops@xxxxxxxx Cc: jnc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic > From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@xxxxxxxxxxx> > I think that I get it. There is no IETF consensus regarding the > compromise proposed below. ... > Right now, the only alternative that I see is to reintroduce > draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic But there is no rough consensus to do that either. RB> That is the claim of an appeal on the table. Let's run the appeal process RB> and figure out whether that claim is valid. We certainly aren't having any RB> success reaching a decision on the mailing list. RB> RB> Ron _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf