Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-05 (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jun 26, 2011, at 10:49 AM, SM wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> The IANA IPv4/IPv6 Address Space registries currently have the following status: RESERVED, LEGACY, ALLOCATED and UNALLOCATED.  Is IANA marking the 192.88.99.0/24 prefix and 2002::/16 prefix as "deprecated" or is it using an existing status?
> 
> BCP 153 lists 192.88.99.0/24 as allocated.  The IANA registry lists it as "reserved".

The assumption (vis--a-vis the discussion in the wg on a or lack of sunset period (and there's a longish port of the thread on this)) is that the prefixs would remain in use for the for the forseeable future. there would therefore be no change required to the status of the  prefixes.

> According to the Writeup:
> 
> "This draft represents the intersection of those views -
>  rough consensus in the best possible meaning of the phrase."
> 
> Will the IESG be using the following text:
> 
>  "It has been approved for publication by the Internet
>   Engineering Steering Group (IESG)."
> 
> for the second paragraph of the "Status of This Memo"?
> 
> Regards,
> -sm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]