> This document obsoletes RFC 4871 for which there is an IPR disclosure ( > http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1547/ ). As this is a move from Proposed to > Draft, is a new IPR disclosure required? The disclosure you cite *is* the new one, which applies to the 4871bis draft (disclosure 1547 updates disclosure 920, which applied to RFC 4871 only). Yahoo! will update the disclosure again when 4871bis gets its own RFC number. Barry, DKIM working group chair _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf