IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- RE: "Discuss" criteria
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: IANA media type registry vs RFC4288
- Re: "Discuss" criteria
- Re: "Discuss" criteria
- Re: "Discuss" criteria
- Re: "Discuss" criteria
- Re: "Discuss" criteria
- RE: "Discuss" criteria
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: "Discuss" criteria
- Re: "Discuss" criteria
- Re: [eap] [FW: Re: Please review -- IETF Last Call ondraft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt]
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
- Re: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- RE: Prague (Praha) street maps and hotels (was Re: IETF 68 hotel full)
- Re: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt
- Re: [FW: Re: [eap] Please review -- IETF Last Call ondraft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt]
- Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
- Re: "Discuss" criteria
- Re: "Discuss" criteria
- Re: "Discuss" criteria
- Re: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: IETF Last Call ondraft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt
- Re: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt
- Re: "Discuss" criteria
- Re: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [FW: Re: [eap] Please review -- IETF Last Call ondraft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt]
- FYI: Last Call for "Independent Submissions to the RFC Editor"
- [OT] Looking for a program which generates binary formats decoders from a high-level description
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: "Discuss" criteria
- [FW: Re: [eap] Please review -- IETF Last Call ondraft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt]
- "Discuss" criteria
- Present from the ITU
- Re: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt
- Re: Network Services RFP for IETF Meetings
- Re: Network Services RFP for IETF Meetings
- Network Services RFP for IETF Meetings
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-radext-filter-06.txt
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-farah-adntf-adns-guidelines-02.txt
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-farah-adntf-adns-guidelines-02.txt
- Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-farah-adntf-adns-guidelines-02.txt
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
- Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
- Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
- Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
- Prague (Praha) street maps and hotels (was Re: IETF 68 hotel full)
- Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
- Re: ion-ion-format open for public comment
- Re: ion-ion-format open for public comment
- Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
- Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
- Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
- Re: IETF 68 hotel full
- Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
- Re: ion-ion-format open for public comment
- Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
- Re: Nomcom06: IAB Member Candidate Feedback
- Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
- Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-terrell-cidr-net-descrpt-expands-iptx-add-spc-11.txt
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
- Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
- Re: Nomcom O6 categories -- GEN == Chair?
- Re: IETF 68 hotel full
- Re: Nomcom06: IAB Member Candidate Feedback
- Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
- Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
- Re: IETF 68 hotel full
- Re: IETF 68 hotel full
- RE: nomcom:Soliciting feedback from entire working groups?
- Re: IETF 68 hotel full
- Re: IETF 68 hotel full
- Re: IETF 68 hotel full
- Re: Nomcom O6 categories -- GEN == Chair?
- Nomcom 06 feedback kudos
- IETF 68 hotel full
- Re: Nomcom O6 categories -- GEN == Chair?
- Nomcom O6 categories -- GEN == Chair?
- CAPWAP Interim Meeting, January 24th & 25th
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
- Re: nomcom:Soliciting feedback from entire working groups?
- Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
- Re: nomcom:Soliciting feedback from entire working groups?
- Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
- Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
- Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
- Re: nomcom:Soliciting feedback from entire working groups?
- From: Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: ion-ion-format open for public comment
- Re: nomcom:Soliciting feedback from entire working groups?
- nomcom:Soliciting feedback from entire working groups?
- HOKEY interim meeting on January 23rd
- Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
- Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
- Re: ion-ion-format open for public comment
- Re: ion-ion-format open for public comment
- Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
- Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
- Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
- Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
- Re: ion-ion-format open for public comment
- Re: ion-ion-format open for public comment
- Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
- Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
- FW: VCF required: TEXT MESSAGING FEATURE / No risk ALL returns
- Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
- Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
- Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
- Autoreply: away from desk
- Re: adoption times (was Re: DNS Choices)
- RE: adoption times (was Re: DNS Choices)
- draft status links on the wg pages?
- Re: [secdir] Review of draft-manral-ipsec-rfc4305-bis-errata-02.txt
- Re: [secdir] Review of draft-manral-ipsec-rfc4305-bis-errata-02.txt
- Re: Review of draft-manral-ipsec-rfc4305-bis-errata-02.txt
- Re: [secdir] Review of draft-manral-ipsec-rfc4305-bis-errata-02.txt
- Re: [secdir] Review of draft-manral-ipsec-rfc4305-bis-errata-02.txt
- Re: Review of draft-manral-ipsec-rfc4305-bis-errata-02.txt
- Re: Review of draft-manral-ipsec-rfc4305-bis-errata-02.txt
- RE: adoption times (was Re: DNS Choices)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- adoption times (was Re: DNS Choices)
- Re: Review of draft-manral-ipsec-rfc4305-bis-errata-02.txt
- Review of draft-manral-ipsec-rfc4305-bis-errata-02.txt
- Re: Welcome to the "Ietf" mailing list
- Re: A plea for subject line sanity (RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-rsvp-te-call-01.txt
- RE: A plea for subject line sanity (RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: A plea for subject line sanity (RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- From: william(at)elan.net
- RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-rsvp-te-call-01.txt
- A plea for subject line sanity (RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-rsvp-te-call-01.txt
- Questions about far end table defined in RFC2495/3895
- Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- Re: Second call for nominations: IAOC position selected by the IAB
- RE: Something better than DNS?
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
- Last Call comments on draft-laganier-ipv6-khi-05 ORCHID
- RE: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
- Re: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
- Re: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
- RE: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
- Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious
- RE: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
- From: Ralph Droms (rdroms)
- RE: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
- Re: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
- Re: IM and Presence history
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- DOMAIN DISPUTES: BIG STAR OLD NAVY BAOZI BAIDU GREEN SWASTIKA SAILOR MOON
- DOMAIN DISPUTES: BIG STAR OLD NAVY BAOZI BAIDU GREEN SWASTIKA SAILOR MOON
- BAOZI BAIDU Thank you for your Open Forum submission.
- RE: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- RE: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- From: Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- RE: Something better than DNS?
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- RE: Interworking between 2 different vendors' Softswitches
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Interworking between 2 different vendors' Softswitches
- Re: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- RE: Something better than DNS?
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: DNS Choices
- RE: IM and Presence history
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: IM and Presence history
- Re: IM and Presence history
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
- From: william(at)elan.net
- Re: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
- Re: IM and Presence history
- From: Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: IM and Presence history
- Re: IM and Presence history
- Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
- From: william(at)elan.net
- RE: IM and Presence history
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Something better than DNS?
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Something better than DNS?
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- RE: IM and Presence history
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- From: Patrick Vande Walle
- Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
- Re: IM and Presence history
- RE: IM and Presence history
- Re: SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- Re: IM and Presence history
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: IM and Presence history
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: IM and Presence history
- From: Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- RE: Something better than DNS?
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: IM and Presence history
- RE: Something better than DNS?
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: IM and Presence history
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- RE: IM and Presence history
- Re: IM and Presence history
- Re: IM and Presence history
- RE: Something better than DNS?
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: IM and Presence history
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: IM and Presence history
- Can't VPN (OT)
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: IM and Presence history
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: IM and Presence history
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
- Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
- RE: do it yourself roots, was Something better than DNS?
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- IM and Presence history
- Re: do it yourself roots, was Something better than DNS?
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: do it yourself roots, was Something better than DNS?
- Re: do it yourself roots, was Something better than DNS?
- Re: do it yourself roots, was Something better than DNS?
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- RE: Something better than DNS?
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- From: Patrick Vande Walle
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- From: Patrick Vande Walle
- Re: SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- Re: SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- Re: IANA media type registry vs RFC4288
- BaoZi.org vs BaiDu.com INFRINGEMENT CLAIM (ARCHIVES)
- Baidu.com vs BAOZI.org (Hu Nu An Wen?)
- Possible INFRINGEMENT... 'BAIDU.com' et al ("CHINA's GOOGLE")
- Re: SRV records considered dubious
- RE: SRV records considered dubious
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [arch-d] Last Call comments on draft-laganier-ipv6-khi-05 ORCHID
- IANA media type registry vs RFC4288
- RE: SRV records considered dubious
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- RE: SRV records considered dubious
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: SRV records considered dubious
- Re: [arch-d] Last Call comments on draft-laganier-ipv6-khi-05 ORCHID
- Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- RE: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Fixing Email administration (including TLS) Was SRV records considered dubious
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: SRV records considered dubious
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: SRV records considered dubious
- RE: SRV records considered dubious
- Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- RE: SRV records considered dubious
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- RE: SRV records considered dubious
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: SRV records considered dubious
- Re: SRV records considered dubious
- RE: SRV records considered dubious
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- Re: SRV records considered dubious
- RE: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: SRV records considered dubious
- Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- Re: Something better than DNS?
- RE: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re:Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- RE: New RR problem not evidence that DNS needs to be replaced (was Re:SRV records considered dubious)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- Re: SRV records considered dubious
- Replacing email protocols: First comes consensus on the requirements
- New RR problem not evidence that DNS needs to be replaced (was Re: SRV records considered dubious)
- Something better than DNS?
- The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- From: william(at)elan.net
- Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- Re: SRV records considered dubious
- Re: SRV records considered dubious
- Re: SRV records considered dubious
- Re: SRV records considered dubious
- Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
- DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- From: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- RE: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' toProposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Draft minutes of Wednesday plenary
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- From: Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- RE: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet EmergencyPreparedness (ieprep)
- From: Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet EmergencyPreparedness (ieprep)
- RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet EmergencyPreparedness (ieprep)
- From: Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- RE: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- From: Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- review of draft-cam-winget-eap-fast-05.txt
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: *.ppt slides
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- Willing to serve a new term in the IAOC
- From: Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Espoo)
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- Re: *.ppt slides
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- RE: [Hubmib] Last Call: 'Managed Objects of EPON' to Proposed Sta ndard (draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-epon-mib)
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- Re: *.ppt slides
- Re: *.ppt slides
- ESP usage at IETF65
- Re: Risk of Laptop Seizure by Customs or Border Patrol Officers ...
- Re: *.ppt slides
- Re: *.ppt slides
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: *.ppt slides
- Re: *.ppt slides
- Re: *.ppt slides
- *.ppt slides
- Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
- From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: Improving Security with Encryption
- RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- From: Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- From: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: IETF 67 Network goes down at 12:00
- IETF 67 Network goes down at 12:00
- RE: Improving Security with Encryption
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- From: Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
- Re: Improving Security with Encryption
- found verizon phone from 339 area code...
- RE: Improving Security with Encryption
- Re: Improving Security with Encryption
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- From: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- RE: Risk of Laptop Seizure by Customs or Border Patrol Officers ...
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Improving Security with Encryption
- Improving Security with Encryption
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: Risk of Laptop Seizure by Customs or Border Patrol Officers ...
- RE: Risk of Laptop Seizure by Customs or Border Patrol Officers ...
- RE: Risk of Laptop Seizure by Customs or Border Patrol Officers ...
- RE: Risk of Laptop Seizure by Customs or Border Patrol Officers ...
- Radia Perlman presentation
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: Risk of Laptop Seizure by Customs or Border Patrol Officers ...
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Risk of Laptop Seizure by Customs or Border Patrol Officers ...
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Prepar edness (ieprep)
- From: Dolly, Martin C, NPE
- Apology Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
- RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Prepar edness (ieprep)
- RE: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (iepr ep)
- RE: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (iepr ep)
- Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Comments on new sipping drafts?
- Comments on new sipping drafts?
- RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- From: Dolly, Martin C, NPE
- Re: Why are we still seeing new Internet-Draft announcements this week?
- RE: nomcom and confidentiality
- Re: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- RE: nomcom and confidentiality
- Re: Why are we still seeing new Internet-Draft announcements this week?
- Why are we still seeing new Internet-Draft announcements this week?
- Re: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- RE: [Int-area] Re: Last Call: 'An IPv6 Prefix for Overlay RoutableCryptographicHash Identifiers (ORCHID)' to Experimental RFC (draft-laganier-ipv6-khi)
- From: Henderson, Thomas R
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- From: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- IETF 67 Streaming update...
- Re: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality
- Re: Lost Logitech headset
- Lost Logitech headset
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality
- lost and found
- Re: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality
- Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- Re: [tsbsg13@xxxxxxx: New Liaison Statement, "ITU-T Sudy Group 13 work on emergency telecommunications"]
- Re: [tsbsg13@xxxxxxx: New Liaison Statement, "ITU-T Sudy Group 13 work on emergency telecommunications"]
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality
- Re: [tsbsg13@xxxxxxx: New Liaison Statement, "ITU-T Sudy Group 13 work on emergency telecommunications"]
- Re: How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?
- Re: [tsbsg13@xxxxxxx: New Liaison Statement, "ITU-T Sudy Group 13 work on emergency telecommunications"]
- [tsbsg13@xxxxxxx: New Liaison Statement, "ITU-T Sudy Group 13 work on emergency telecommunications"]
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality
- The Party?s Almost Over (But Not Quite)
- Found: lost SecureID card
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality
- IPv6 calls for the new Internet
- Re: How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- lost SecureID card
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality
- Re: nomcom and confidentiality
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: On Nov 5, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
- On Nov 5, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
- RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
- RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Prepar edness (ieprep)
- Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
- Re: How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (iepr ep)
- Re: How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?
- Re: How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (iepr ep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?
- How confidential is the information we share with the Nomcom?
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- My availability for a new term as Operations & Management Area Director
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (iepr ep)
- IETF67 Network is up!
- Re: The ietf blog should support atom
- The ietf blog should support atom
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (iepr ep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (iepr ep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- IASA Reports - IETF 67, San Diego
- Fwd: Factual correction
- RE: Interesting turn of events
- Interesting turn of events
- IETF 67 audio-streaming, NOC info and webpage...
- hokeyp and MIP6 slots are colliding
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: Scary technology
- Encouraging nominations for IETF Chair
- FW: [Hubmib] Last Call: 'Managed Objects of EPON' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-epon-mib)
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- RFC Editor Letter of Intent
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- RE: Proper definitions of RFC-1212 and RFC-1215 not found
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- RE: References to XML 'documents'
- Proper definitions of RFC-1212 and RFC-1215 not found
- RE: References to XML 'documents'
- RE: References to XML 'documents'
- Re: Scary technology
- Scary technology
- References to XML 'documents'
- Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
- Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
- Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
- Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
- Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
- Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
- Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
- RE: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
- Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
- Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
- RE: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Last Call: 'An IPv6 Prefix for Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash Identifiers (ORCHID)' to Experimental RFC (draft-laganier-ipv6-khi)
- Re: [Int-area] Re: Last Call: 'An IPv6 Prefix for Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash Identifiers (ORCHID)' to Experimental RFC (draft-laganier-ipv6-khi)
- Re: [Int-area] Re: Last Call: 'An IPv6 Prefix for Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash Identifiers (ORCHID)' to Experimental RFC (draft-laganier-ipv6-khi)
- Re: [Int-area] Re: Last Call: 'An IPv6 Prefix for Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash Identifiers (ORCHID)' to Experimental RFC (draft-laganier-ipv6-khi)
- Re: Last Call: 'An IPv6 Prefix for Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash Identifiers (ORCHID)' to Experimental RFC (draft-laganier-ipv6-khi)
- Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
- Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
- Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
- Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
- Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
- Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
- Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
- Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
- Re: My Corporation is building, designing the largest private Multicast network in the world
- My Corporation is building, designing the largest private Multicast network in the world
- From: Steve Giammarino (US)
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]