Noel Chiappa wrote:
> > From: John Kristoff <jtk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > No, it's not about complexity, but nor is it about robustness. It's
> > about "functionality" and where to place it.
> > ...
> > .. a twice careful read of the original paper that gets referred to so
> > much
>
> I can sympathize with your complaint; I got so irked by people
> misunderstanding what the end-end principle was (along another axis - state)
> that I wrote a rant about it ("Will The Real 'End-End Principle' Please Stand
> Up?"), available here:
We have a lot work going on in the IETF today. What common architectural
principles or assumptions should the current work adhere to? Can the IAB
articulate that?
To quote rfc 1601:
A major role of the IAB is long range planning. The IAB is
expected to "pay attention" to important long-term issues in the
Internet, and to make sure that these issues are brought to the
attention of the group(s) that are in a position to address them.
It is also expected to play a role in assuring that the people
responsible for evolving the Internet and its technology are aware
of the essential elements of the Internet architecture.
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf