> >> maybe we can have the default "IETF61" SSID be pro-IPv6, and SSID > >> "legacy" be IPv4-only :-P > > > > > > Ahh, well. That moves the change from being coercive to being cool. > > No, that moves it to being pejorative. > > In any case, what is the need for separate SSID's? Do you truly > intend to clutter the airspace further with another set of AP's? > There are effectively only three channels and you really want to use > all three already to provide overlapping non-interfering coverage... you right. we have been running dual stack network since 1998 or something (Marc Blanchet should have the real answer), and we even supplied IPv6-to-IPv4 translators, so there should be no problem at all. I can bring in IPv6-to-IPv4 translator if necessary. it would be an OpenBSD Soekris box. itojun _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf