On 2007-07-17 14:04, Keith Moore wrote: ...
the problem is the expectation that in IPv6 the application has to choose which address(es) to use, coupled with the high probability that the first address(es) chosen will not work well.
What high probability is that? The presumption is that the RFC 4384 policy will put the one most likely to work first in the list. Why is this any different from IPv4 with alternate addresses? Brian _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf