> > Maybe we are getting to the point in time where we should only have IPv6 > > at IETF meetings or it that's premature run IPv4 behind a couple of > > layers of NAT. > > On the theory that the ietf meeting net is for production services, wouldn't > it make sense to have the time to cut over to pure ipv6 be when production use > of ipv4 becomes minimal? maybe we can have the default "IETF61" SSID be pro-IPv6, and SSID "legacy" be IPv4-only :-P itojun _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf