At 9:49 AM -0500 7/25/07, Dave Crocker wrote: >Ted Hardie wrote: >> A broader solution that encompasses other potential >>uses of content negotiation seems to me in order. > >Other than probably looking for an interaction mechanism, rather than one through email, does this have any relationship to: > > Content Negotiation for Messaging Services based on Email > <http://www.apps.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3297.html>? > >d/ >-- > > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net The SIP preference/capabilities work broadly re-uses the CONNEG framework. This optimization treats a particular problem with "application" as a top-level type in the SIP context. Though there are application types in 3297 (application/pdf), using them in negotiation hits SIP in somewhat different ways. The question is whether generalizing the subtype content negotiation needed there would be useful for other content negotiation users. Ted _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf