> Thus spake "Keith Moore" <moore@xxxxxxxxxx> > > NAT-PT really needs to be wiped off the face of the earth. It > > provides all of the disadvantages of IPv4+NAT with all of the > > transition costs of IPv6. > > Indeed it does. However, it has significant benefits as well: (snip) cannot agree more. i do not care if it is based on TCP/UDP relaying (per session) or NAT-PT (per packet), but IPv6-to-IPv4 translators have its own benefits. and of course drawbacks, but the drawback is much smaller than conventional IPv4-to-IPv4 NAT as we have an escape plan (use native IPv6). itojun _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf