Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> We could have more ADs and split and/or layer the work to reduce the
> per-person load. That may not be the only - or even best - way forward,
>   
It's not clearly even a way forward.  the more ADs there are, the harder
it is to coordinate between the ADs and the areas.

IETF structure doesn't scale.   It's not clear that it can scale - at
least, I've never seen a plan for IETF that could scale, and  most of
the ideas I've seen that purport to help IETF scale would make it
worse.   until we find a way to make IETF scale, we have to rely on
prioritizing and load shedding.


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]