Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
> I certainly do not need to work out how to persuade my Checkpoint client to talk to my corporate VPN via  IPv6 in order to contribute to KEYPROV, DKIM or any of the other WGs I will be attending.
>   
point taken.  but you do need to know basics of how IPv6 works to
competently participate in any IETF working group.  you might think that
IPv6 is irrelevant, but it's not, because people are constantly making
IPv4-specific assumptions in higher-level protocol designs without
realizing it.
> The application is miserable enough at the best of times without additional issues. And since the policy configuration is verified by the gateway I cannot change the policy unilateraly.
>   
if you work for a company that forces you to use crappy software, I feel
for you.  but hey, we all have our burdens to bear. 
> The point about eating dog food is not to order the salespeople to eat the dog food or else. If the salespeople refuse to eat the dog food you are meant to go back and fix it. The approach being suggested here is to tell the salespeople to eat it and like it.
>   
what do salespeople have to do with IETF?


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]