Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Laksminath,

> Let me stop being cynical and say that it would be worthwhile to iron
> out the review criteria as clearly as possible.

I would support a document giving clearer guidelines
for this. Draft-narten-successful-bof already
outlines some of the things that a BOF proposal
should satisfy. If you or someone else has new text that
goes beyond this, I'd be interested in taking a look.

> The now "dead" discuss criteria document is a good example of the
> right direction.

Yes -- but for clarification to others (I know you are aware of this), the
criteria are in active use by the IESG and often referred to when we
talk about some AD's discusses. The document was originally an
I-D (now expired), but is available from:

http://www.ietf.org/u/ietfchair/discuss-criteria.html

Jari


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]