Laksminath, > Let me stop being cynical and say that it would be worthwhile to iron > out the review criteria as clearly as possible. I would support a document giving clearer guidelines for this. Draft-narten-successful-bof already outlines some of the things that a BOF proposal should satisfy. If you or someone else has new text that goes beyond this, I'd be interested in taking a look. > The now "dead" discuss criteria document is a good example of the > right direction. Yes -- but for clarification to others (I know you are aware of this), the criteria are in active use by the IESG and often referred to when we talk about some AD's discusses. The document was originally an I-D (now expired), but is available from: http://www.ietf.org/u/ietfchair/discuss-criteria.html Jari _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf