> NAT-PT really needs to be wiped off the face of the earth. It provides > all of the disadvantages of IPv4+NAT with all of the transition costs of > IPv6. If there is ever any significant penetration of NAT-PT, then the > pseudo-IPv6 network will not be able to support any more kinds of > applications than the NATted IPv4 does today. i tend to agree, but in rfc-index.txt i could not find the change of state to "Historic". what happend to very similar (and much more evil IMHO) transition technology, SIIT? itojun _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf