Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 2007-06-27 15:52, Joe Touch wrote: >> >> Keith Moore wrote: >>>> We could have more ADs and split and/or layer the work to reduce the >>>> per-person load. That may not be the only - or even best - way forward, >>>> >>> It's not clearly even a way forward. the more ADs there are, the harder >>> it is to coordinate between the ADs and the areas. >> >> Yes, each AD becomes less efficient, but perhaps the goal shouldn't be >> the efficiency of the individual volunteers but the ability to be more >> inclusive in who we can consider for these roles. > > It isn't an issue of individual efficiency. A committee of 15 is already > unwieldy given our desire for consensus; the IESG thought long and > carefully before the last increase (from 6 to 7 Areas). I don't see > how it can be increased further. I don't see increasing the areas; I see splitting them down as a possible way. Leaving an AD at the top level with less work, and having sub-ADs report to them. Joe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf