Re: Un-expiring procedural documents

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2007-06-13 17:18, Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 2:11 PM +0300 6/13/07, Jari Arkko wrote:
Yes -- but for clarification to others (I know you are aware of this), the
criteria are in active use by the IESG and often referred to when we
talk about some AD's discusses. The document was originally an
I-D (now expired), but is available from:

Isn't this what the ION series is for?

Sure, but someone has to do the work to IONize each such document.
That's why I built the ad hoc list still to be found at
http://www.ietf.org/u/ietfchair/opNotes.html

   Brian

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]