Harald Alvestrand wrote: > Joe Touch wrote: >> Brian E Carpenter wrote: ... >> I don't see increasing the areas; I see splitting them down as a >> possible way. Leaving an AD at the top level with less work, and having >> sub-ADs report to them. > draft-iesg-alvestrand-twolevel, published October 2003, proposed > something of that sort. > > Last trace of discussion I could find with Google was the Geneva IESG > retreat in 2005 (?), with the quote: > > "We discussed whether there was a need to formalize this into a > two-level delegation system, but concluded that there was no workload > advantage in formally changing the primary role of the Area Directors." > > I still don't believe that anything significantly less radical will make > a significant difference to the "IESG workload problem". Agreed - perhaps 3-level. ;-) > But at the > moment, the IESG/IETF interface doesn't seem to be in "immediate crisis" > mode, so I guess we'll survive another year. That depends on who you ask; IMO, the dearth of certain communities in the IESG and IAB has been a continuing cause for concern. Joe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf