>>>>> "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Jeffrey> Sam Hartman wrote:
>> Unless there is strong support for the more complex
>> registration process in the draft, we'd like to go to expert
>> review.
Jeffrey> The technical argument in favor of a review list, whether
Jeffrey> a special list for this purpose or some pre-existing list
Jeffrey> such as SecDir, is that it is not always easy to find
Jeffrey> experts who are familiar with both of the protocols being
Jeffrey> bound. As a result, having more reviewers is a safety
Jeffrey> net. This is especially important for reviews of
Jeffrey> security protocols.
How would you feel about an optional review list?
IESG experience has shown that mandatory review steps in previous
registries tend to add frustration. There are cases where optional
review lists do add value.
--Sam
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf