Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Jeffrey> Sam Hartman wrote:
    >> Unless there is strong support for the more complex
    >> registration process in the draft, we'd like to go to expert
    >> review.

    Jeffrey> The technical argument in favor of a review list, whether
    Jeffrey> a special list for this purpose or some pre-existing list
    Jeffrey> such as SecDir, is that it is not always easy to find
    Jeffrey> experts who are familiar with both of the protocols being
    Jeffrey> bound.  As a result, having more reviewers is a safety
    Jeffrey> net.  This is especially important for reviews of
    Jeffrey> security protocols.

How would you feel about an optional review list?

IESG experience has shown that mandatory review steps in previous
registries tend to add frustration.  There are cases where optional
review lists do add value.

--Sam


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]