Sam Hartman wrote: > Unless there is strong support for the more complex registration > process in the draft, we'd like to go to expert review. The technical argument in favor of a review list, whether a special list for this purpose or some pre-existing list such as SecDir, is that it is not always easy to find experts who are familiar with both of the protocols being bound. As a result, having more reviewers is a safety net. This is especially important for reviews of security protocols. I do not believe that the registration process defined in this draft is particularly burdensome. It is a well defined process with time limits that will provide a predictable response time for requesters. It doesn't limit the Area Director's ability to select an expert to perform the review. It simply provides for transparency and public comment on the registration. I believe the registration procedure should be implemented as described in the draft. Jeffrey Altman
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf