Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The meeting fee is almost the single
largest monetary expense for me, and it keeps going up.

As an individual non-attendee, I couldn't agree more. Even though the December meeting is (literally) on my doorstep, there is no way I can justify $750 just to attend a pair of WG meetings.

Well, the fee charged would appear to be directly correlated to the number of people attending. That is, because the IETF must cover its costs not just for the meetings but also for the rest of the year, a good proportion of the cost is independent of the meetings and so must increase per capita as the number of attendees decreases.

But wait! There is also a direct correlation between the number of people attending and the cost. That is, the cost is a direct deterrent.

Economists out there will recognise this problem, and will understand where the spiral is headed.

The choice and cost of location can compound the problem, and it seems to me that one of the main objectives of setting meeting venues (both geography and hotel) must be to increase attendance and so to increase revenue.

Adrian


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]