Re: Charging I-Ds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> In principle I would be against charging, but my experience of being a
>> chair makes me believe that many authors have no reason to publish
>> their I-D which are just a burden to the I-D secretariat and thus the
>> entire IETF community. 
>that's a really amazing statement.  If I were participating in a WG
>whose chair had that attitude, I'd be lobbying hard with the IESG for
>another chair, as I'd suspect that the incumbent chair was
>inappropriately hostile to introduction of new ideas within the WG.

Sorry, what "attitude" are you talking about here ? I was speaking
about people who publish drafts but never say a word to anyone about
their draft. What's the purpose ? If the purpose is to get new ideas
through, I don't see how publishing a draft and non advertising is
useful for the sender (it may for the reader). But more importantly, I
don't see what you see as "hostile" in the observation above. 

Thierry.



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]