> We would at last have a mechanism to trump the usual claim > that an internet draft has been submitted so please consider > me as good as being a standard. ULA-C was in a draft that has expired and was in fact specifically dropped by the WG that produced the ULA RFC. Nevertheless, at least one person believes that means ULA-C is as good as being a standard and has asked the RIRs to begin operating a registry for ULA-C addresses. > Or another organization could run the registry. Well, if you want a centrally-registered ULA prefix that is globally unique, you can get one from this registry: http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/ula/ NOTE: this is not the same as ULA-C, this is a central registry of pseudo-randomnly generated ULAs as defined in RFC 4193. --Michael Dillon _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf