Fedora Extras
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: FE devel rebuild?
- Re: FE devel rebuild?
- Re: rpms/sextractor/FC-4 sextractor.spec,1.2,1.3
- Re: FE devel rebuild?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- [Bug 173035] Review Request: chmlib - Library for dealing with ITSS/CHM format files
- Re: FE devel rebuild?
- Re: rpms/sextractor/FC-4 sextractor.spec,1.2,1.3
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: rpms/sextractor/FC-4 sextractor.spec,1.2,1.3
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- FESCo Meeting Minutes for 2006-07-20
- Re: Python submodule naming
- Re: rpms/sextractor/FC-4 sextractor.spec,1.2,1.3
- Re: FE devel rebuild?
- Re: FE devel rebuild?
- Python submodule naming
- Re: FE devel rebuild?
- Re: Renaming in CVS
- Re: FE devel rebuild?
- Re: FE devel rebuild?
- Re: rpms/nas/devel nas.spec,1.2,1.3
- Re: rpms/nas/FC-4 nas.spec,1.4,1.5
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Renaming in CVS
- Renaming in CVS
- FE devel rebuild?
- Sugg: Expiring of failed build on the buildsystem
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-07-20
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-07-20
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-07-20
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-07-20
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 20, 2006
- Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-07-20
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-07-20
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 20, 2006
- Re: package submission take over question.
- Re: package submission take over question.
- Re: package submission take over question.
- Re: package submission take over question.
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 20, 2006
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 20, 2006
- FE Package Status of Jul 20, 2006
- Re: package submission take over question.
- Slab menu panel applet
- Re: package submission take over question.
- Re: package submission take over question.
- package submission take over question.
- Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-07-18
- Re: add-to-owners helper script...
- Re: add-to-owners helper script...
- Re: Can i Obsoletes core packages from extras package?
- Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-07-18
- Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-07-18
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-07-19
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-07-19
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-07-19
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-07-19
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-07-19
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-07-19
- Re: add-to-owners helper script...
- Re: add-to-owners helper script...
- Re: add-to-owners helper script...
- Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-07-18
- Re: add-to-owners helper script...
- Re: add-to-owners helper script...
- add-to-owners helper script...
- Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-07-18
- Re: VTK anyone?
- Re: Can i Obsoletes core packages from extras package?
- Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-07-17
- Re: rpms/skstream/devel skstream.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Re: Can i Obsoletes core packages from extras package?
- Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-07-18
- Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-07-18
- Re: Can i Obsoletes core packages from extras package?
- Re: Can i Obsoletes core packages from extras package?
- Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-07-17
- Can i Obsoletes core packages from extras package?
- Re: rpms/skstream/devel skstream.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-07-17
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-07-17
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-07-17
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-07-17
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-07-17
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-07-17
- Re: release tags during review
- Re: Cancle Fedora Listings - Thank You
- Cancle Fedora Listings - Thank You
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-07-16
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-07-16
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-07-16
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-07-16
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-07-16
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-07-16
- Re: freetds suitable for extras
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 15, 2006
- Re: freetds suitable for extras
- freetds suitable for extras
- Conditionals in spec files to determine where it's building?
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: Planning next version of rpmdevtools
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 15, 2006
- Re: How to deal with undefined-non-weak-symbol
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-07-15
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-07-15
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-07-15
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-07-15
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-07-15
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-07-15
- Re: How to deal with undefined-non-weak-symbol
- Re: rebuilding heartbeat for new upstream fails in mock
- Re: rebuilding heartbeat for new upstream fails in mock
- rebuilding heartbeat for new upstream fails in mock
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- How to deal with undefined-non-weak-symbol
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 15, 2006
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 15, 2006
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 15, 2006
- FE Package Status of Jul 15, 2006
- Re: Planning next version of rpmdevtools
- Planning next version of rpmdevtools
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- Re: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- Re: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- Re: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- Re: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- Re: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- Re: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- Re: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- Re: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- Re: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- Re: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- Re: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- Re: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- Re: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- Re: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- Re: libtool problem
- Re: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- libtool problem
- Re: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- Re: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- Re: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- Re: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
- Re: FESCo Meeting 2006 July 13 Minutes
- FESCo Meeting 2006 July 13 Minutes
- Re: release tags during review
- Re: release tags during review
- Re: release tags during review
- Re: release tags during review
- Re: release tags during review
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- release tags during review
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: rpms/driftnet/FC-5 driftnet.spec,1.3,1.4
- Re: rpms/driftnet/FC-5 driftnet.spec,1.3,1.4
- Re: rpmlint problem: Class-Path in manifest problem
- Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-07-13
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-07-13
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-07-13
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-07-13
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-07-13
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Re: rpms/driftnet/FC-5 driftnet.spec,1.3,1.4
- Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-07-13
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-07-13
- Re: rpmlint problem: Class-Path in manifest problem
- Re: libvisual-plugins
- Re: libvisual-plugins
- Re: rpmlint problem: Class-Path in manifest problem
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: rpmlint problem: Class-Path in manifest problem
- Re: rpmlint problem: Class-Path in manifest problem
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Coment to the Extras/SponsorProcess Page
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Ghost pyo
- Coment to the Extras/SponsorProcess Page
- Re: Ghost pyo
- Re: Ghost pyo
- Re: Ghost pyo
- Ghost pyo
- rpmlint problem: Class-Path in manifest problem
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Howto add new sources files to mesa-source package.
- Re: Comment to Extras/Contributors
- Comment to Extras/Contributors
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: Is it possible to add pwc kernel module as Fedora Extras package?
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: Is it possible to add pwc kernel module as Fedora Extras package?
- Re: Is it possible to add pwc kernel module as Fedora Extras package?
- Re: Is it possible to add pwc kernel module as Fedora Extras package?
- Is it possible to add pwc kernel module as Fedora Extras package?
- Re: VTK anyone?
- Re: VTK anyone?
- Re: SELinux protect my squid using havp as parent proxy
- SELinux protect my squid using havp as parent proxy
- libvisual-plugins
- Re: VTK anyone?
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: gal and oaf for FE
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: gal and oaf for FE
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: Advice on desktop icons
- Re: Advice on desktop icons
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: Advice on desktop icons
- Re: VTK anyone?
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: What do Extras contributors use the wiki for?
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
- Re: rpms/perl-Image-ExifTool/devel perl-Image-ExifTool-avoidtheworduse.patch, NONE, 1.1 perl-Image-ExifTool.spec, 1.5, 1.6
- Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: rpms/perl-Image-ExifTool/devel perl-Image-ExifTool-avoidtheworduse.patch, NONE, 1.1 perl-Image-ExifTool.spec, 1.5, 1.6
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- [Bug 178905] Review Request: smbldap-tools
- Re: What do Extras contributors use the wiki for?
- [Bug 178905] Review Request: smbldap-tools
- Re: What do Extras contributors use the wiki for?
- Re: What do Extras contributors use the wiki for?
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-07-10
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-07-10
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-07-10
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-07-10
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-07-10
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-07-10
- Re: rpms/monodoc/devel monodoc.spec,1.7,1.8
- Re: unversioned upstream source
- Re: unversioned upstream source
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: gal and oaf for FE
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: gal and oaf for FE
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: gal and oaf for FE
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: rpms/gambas/devel gambas-1.0.16-64bit.patch, NONE, 1.1 gambas.spec, 1.14, 1.15
- Re: gal and oaf for FE
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: gal and oaf for FE
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: rpms/gambas/devel gambas-1.0.16-64bit.patch, NONE, 1.1 gambas.spec, 1.14, 1.15
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Advice on desktop icons
- Re: gal and oaf for FE
- Re: Advice on desktop icons
- Re: Advice on desktop icons
- Re: Advice on desktop icons
- Advice on desktop icons
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: aMSN plugins
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: VTK anyone?
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: aMSN plugins
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: What do Extras contributors use the wiki for?
- unversioned upstream source
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: aMSN plugins
- Re: VTK anyone?
- Re: aMSN plugins
- aMSN plugins
- Re: VTK anyone?
- Re: Buildsystem SSL Cert broken?
- Re: VTK anyone?
- Re: Buildsystem SSL Cert broken?
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- VTK anyone?
- Re: FE-NEW assigned and unassigned (Was Eiciel )
- Re: rpms/nant/devel nant-libdir.patch, NONE, 1.1 nant.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Re: rpms/monodoc/devel monodoc.spec,1.7,1.8
- Re: gal and oaf for FE
- Re: gal and oaf for FE
- Re: gal and oaf for FE
- Re: Provides for Obsoletes
- Re: obsolete dependencies on libsysfs.so.1
- gal and oaf for FE
- Buildsystem SSL Cert broken?
- Re: rpms/monodoc/devel monodoc.spec,1.7,1.8
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: rpms/monodoc/devel monodoc.spec,1.7,1.8
- Re: repodata shot?
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Move Squirrelmail to Extras?
- Re: obsolete dependencies on libsysfs.so.1
- Re: Provides for Obsoletes
- Provides for Obsoletes
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: obsolete dependencies on libsysfs.so.1
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: obsolete dependencies on libsysfs.so.1
- Re: obsolete dependencies on libsysfs.so.1
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: QA ideas (was Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better)
- obsolete dependencies on libsysfs.so.1
- What do Extras contributors use the wiki for?
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: QA ideas (was Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better)
- Re: repodata shot?
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- "make upload" problems (was: Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-07-09)
- QA ideas (was Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better)
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-07-09
- Re: Eiciel
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Rolling Extras (was: Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better)
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- [SIG Games] Package for TA Spring available
- Re: repodata shot?
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-07-09
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-07-09
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-07-09
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-07-09
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-07-09
- Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-07-09
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-07-09
- Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better
- Re: FE-NEW assigned and unassigned (Was Eiciel )
- Re: repodata shot?
- Re: repodata shot?
- Re: Problem with a package
- Re: Problem with a package
- Re: Problem with a package
- Re: repodata shot?
- Re: repodata shot?
- Re: repodata shot?
- repodata shot?
- Re: %config in a spec file
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: Eiciel
- Re: Problem with a package
- Re: FE-NEW assigned and unassigned (Was Eiciel )
- Re: Eiciel
- FE-NEW assigned and unassigned (Was Eiciel )
- Re: %config in a spec file
- Eiciel (was: Re: Package review stats)
- %config in a spec file
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-07-07
- Re: Package review stats
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Re: Wiki not editable?
- Wiki not editable?
- Re: Package review stats
- Re: Question on the "Source:" line on a .spec file
- Question on the "Source:" line on a .spec file
- Re: This week's FESCo Meeting Summary
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-07-07
- Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-07-07
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-07-07
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-07-07
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-07-07
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-07-07
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-07-07
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-07-07
- Re: Short vacation
- [Bug 180066] Request: Inclusion of a ruby template file
- Re: Package review stats
- Re: Package review stats
- Re: Short vacation
- Re: Package review stats
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Short vacation
- Short vacation
- Re: Opinions on the election (was: Re: FESCo Election Results)
- Re: This week's FESCo Meeting Summary
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Opinions on the election (was: Re: FESCo Election Results)
- RogueScanner
- Re: Package review stats
- Re: Zaurus connecting USB error
- Re: Package review stats
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Zaurus connecting USB error
- Re: Opinions on the election (was: Re: FESCo Election Results)
- Re: Opinions on the election (was: Re: FESCo Election Results)
- Re: Opinions on the election (was: Re: FESCo Election Results)
- Re: Package review stats
- Re: Package review stats
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: rpms/bit/devel bit.spec,1.1,1.2
- Package review stats
- Re: Opinions on the election
- Re: Anjuta : RFC
- Re: Anjuta : RFC
- Re: Opinions on the election (was: Re: FESCo Election Results)
- Re: Anjuta : RFC
- Re: Anjuta : RFC
- Re: Opinions on the election (was: Re: FESCo Election Results)
- Re: Packaging questions about libvisual
- Re: Opinions on the election (was: Re: FESCo Election Results)
- Re: Opinions on the election (was: Re: FESCo Election Results)
- Re: Anjuta : RFC
- Re: DejaVu fonts for Fedora Core 6 feedback call
- Re: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop
- Re: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop
- Re: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop
- Re: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop
- Re: wine for FC4 problem?
- Packaging questions about libvisual
- wine for FC4 problem?
- Re: rpms/bit/devel bit.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Re: rpms/bit/devel bit.spec,1.1,1.2
- Re: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop
- Re: DejaVu fonts for Fedora Core 6 feedback call
- Re: rpms/bit/devel bit.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Re: rpms/perl-Class-InsideOut/devel perl-Class-InsideOut.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Source file consolidation on CVS
- Re: How to split a package to have a -devel one?
- Re: How to split a package to have a -devel one?
- Re: How to split a package to have a -devel one?
- Anjuta : RFC
- This week's FESCo Meeting Summary
- Problem with a package
- Re: DejaVu fonts for Fedora Core 6 feedback call
- How to split a package to have a -devel one?
- Re: DejaVu fonts for Fedora Core 6 feedback call
- Re: allegro using packages need a rebuild
- [Bug 180066] Request: Inclusion of a ruby template file
- Re: allegro using packages need a rebuild
- Re: allegro using packages need a rebuild
- allegro using packages need a rebuild
- Re: DejaVu fonts for Fedora Core 6 feedback call
- Re: FESCo Election Results
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 5, 2006
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- [Bug 171541] Review Request: kimdaba: KDE Image Database
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 5, 2006
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 5, 2006
- Re: DejaVu fonts for Fedora Core 6 feedback call
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 5, 2006
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 5, 2006
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 5, 2006
- Re: DejaVu fonts for Fedora Core 6 feedback call
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: FESCo Election Results
- Re: DejaVu fonts for Fedora Core 6 feedback call
- Re: FESCo Election Results
- Re: FESCo Election Results
- Re: Opinions on the election (was: Re: FESCo Election Results)
- Re: Opinions on the election (was: Re: FESCo Election Results)
- Re: FESCo Election Results
- Re: Opinions on the election (was: Re: FESCo Election Results)
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: FESCo Election Results
- Packaging/Guidelines - Usage of %{optflags}, Source tag
- Re: Packaging/Guidelines - Usage of %{optflags}, Source tag
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 5, 2006
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- Re: FESCo Election Results
- Re: FESCo Election Results
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- Re: DejaVu fonts for Fedora Core 6 feedback call
- Re: For wishlist: KeyTouch
- Re: For wishlist: KeyTouch
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Opinions on the election
- Re: DejaVu fonts for Fedora Core 6 feedback call
- Re: For wishlist: KeyTouch
- Re: For wishlist: KeyTouch
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- Re: "contingent" (was Re: FESCo Election Results)
- Re: "contingent" (was Re: FESCo Election Results)
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: DejaVu fonts for Fedora Core 6 feedback call
- Re: python-psycopg2 package spec
- Re: FESCo Election Results
- Re: FESCo Election Results
- Re: Opinions on the election
- Re: RFE: Review Request: <main package name here> - <Summary>
- Re: "contingent" (was Re: FESCo Election Results)
- Leaving - Re: FESCo Election Results
- Re: DejaVu fonts for Fedora Core 6 feedback call
- Re: Opinions on the election
- Re: Opinions on the election
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- "contingent" (was Re: FESCo Election Results)
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- Re: FESCo Election Results
- Re: FESCo Election Results
- Re: FESCo Election Results
- Re: FESCo Election Results
- Re: FESCo Election Results
- Re: FESCo Election Results
- Re: FESCo Election Results
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 5, 2006
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 5, 2006
- Re: Opinions on the election (was: Re: FESCo Election Results)
- Re: Opinions on the election (was: Re: FESCo Election Results)
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 5, 2006
- Opinions on the election (was: Re: FESCo Election Results)
- Re: FESCo Election Results
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 5, 2006
- Re: enforce co-maintainers
- Re: FESCo Election Results
- Re: FE Package Status of Jul 5, 2006
- FE Package Status of Jul 5, 2006
- Re: python-psycopg2 package spec
- FESCo Election Results
- Re: enforce co-maintainers (was: Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.)
- Re: enforce co-maintainers (was: Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.)
- Re: enforce co-maintainers
- Re: enforce co-maintainers
- Re: enforce co-maintainers (was: Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.)
- Re: enforce co-maintainers
- Re: enforce co-maintainers (was: Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.)
- Re: enforce co-maintainers (was: Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.)
- enforce co-maintainers (was: Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.)
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: RFE: Review Request: <main package name here> - <Summary>
- Re: RFE: Review Request: <main package name here> - <Summary>
- For wishlist: KeyTouch
- Re: Azureus/gcj x86_64 (i'm on i386)
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: DejaVu fonts for Fedora Core 6 feedback call
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: DejaVu fonts for Fedora Core 6 feedback call
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- RFE: Review Request: <main package name here> - <Summary>
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: DejaVu fonts for Fedora Core 6 feedback call
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.
- next FESCo meeting agenda.
- Re: Azureus/gcj x86_64
- Re: DejaVu fonts for Fedora Core 6 feedback call
- Re: Azureus/gcj x86_64
- DejaVu fonts for Fedora Core 6 feedback call
- Re: Azureus/gcj x86_64
- Re: Azureus/gcj x86_64
- Re: Move Squirrelmail to Extras?
- Move Squirrelmail to Extras?
- From: Konstantin Ryabitsev
- Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-07-04
- Re: Azureus/gcj x86_64
- Re: Azureus/gcj x86_64
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- Re: rpms/wordpress/FC-5 README.fedora.wordpress, NONE, 1.1 wordpress.spec, 1.1, 1.2
- Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-07-04
- Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-07-04
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-07-04
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-07-04
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-07-04
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-07-04
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Re: rpms/monodoc/devel monodoc.spec,1.5,1.6
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-07-04
- Re: PHP packaging guidelines not yet accepted
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Azureus/gcj x86_64
- Re: PHP packaging guidelines not yet accepted
- python-psycopg2 package spec
- Re: rpms/monodoc/devel monodoc.spec,1.5,1.6
- Re: rpms/monodoc/devel monodoc.spec,1.5,1.6
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- Re: opengroupware for FE
- Re: New package version control
- opengroupware for FE
- Re: Fwd: [Fedora-infrastructure-list] New package version control
- Re: Problem building with mock
- Re: Fwd: [Fedora-infrastructure-list] New package version control
- Problem building with mock
- Re: CVS server problems?
- Re: CVS server problems?
- Re: CVS server problems?
- Re: CVS server problems?
- Re: CVS server problems?
- CVS server problems?
- Re: Fwd: [Fedora-infrastructure-list] New package version control
- Re: Fwd: [Fedora-infrastructure-list] New package version control
- Re: Mass rebuild of Extras packages for FC6? (was: Re: Mass rebuild of core packages coming soon)
- Re: New package version control
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-07-03
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-07-03
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-07-03
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-07-03
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Re: New package version control
- Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-07-03
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-07-03
- Re: Fwd: [Fedora-infrastructure-list] New package version control
- Re: Fwd: [Fedora-infrastructure-list] New package version control
- Fw: [Audacity-devel] [Audacity-help] Fedora Core Audacity w/o MP3 "support"
- Fw: [Audacity-devel] [Audacity-help] Fedora Core Audacity w/o MP3 "support"
- Re: adding optipng to extras
- Summary from the last FESCo meeting
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora General Discussion]
[Fedora Art]
[Fedora Docs]
[Fedora Package Review]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite Backpacking]
[KDE Users]