FE-NEW assigned and unassigned (Was Eiciel )

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Michael Schwendt schrieb:
> On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 14:24:57 +0100, Andy Burns wrote:
>> Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> The ticket is assigned to you instead of the default dummy owner of
> Package Review tickets. This may be misunderstood by anyone who browses
> the FE-NEW list, looking for "unassigned" package reviews.

Agreed -- that's a common problem AFAICS (some bugs were for example
accidentally assigned to the default and mostly ignored
bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx account).

Well, what do do? We can change the state to "NEW" without asking the
bugzilla admin IIRC (correct me if I'm wrong). So the best probably
would be if reviewers would simply ignore the "new" or "assigned" status
when looking at bugs blocking FE-NEW. That *should* work because all
packages under review *should* block FE-REVIEW instead of FE-NEW. Okay,
that were two "should" in one sentence, and that's probably the reason
why it won't work :-/

CU
thl

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux