Bill Nottingham wrote: > Nils Philippsen (nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx) said: >> > Known, which is why this package already includes: >> > Conflicts: libc-client-devel >> > A smarter version of this script could probably omit bits already >> > marked >> > with a Conflicts: tag. (: >> >> Somehow this strikes me as wrong... Either uw-imap-devel supersedes >> libc-client-devel or vice versa (then one should also obsolete the >> other) or they are independent things (in which case the file conflicts >> should be solved, e.g. by using separate base directories for the >> files). > > Consdering they come from the same code base... why would you use one > and not the other? Before fc6, the version uw-imap provided was newer than that of Core. As of fc6, they are the same. I had once asked the Core libc-client maintainer what to do about that, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/179017#c1 but they didn't respond. I didn't follow up on it. -- Rex -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
